THE EFFECTS OF CRIMPING ON ACCURACY AND VELOCITY

I have read a number of articles discussing the advantages and disadvantages of crimping the bullet in the case. In fact, there is a very good article in the February issue of Petersen’s RIFLE SHOOTER magazine, by Mr. Wayne van Zwoll discussing this very subject.

He did not go as far as doing any shooting tests. And as I have a number of factory crimp dies from LEE – who have always implied that crimped ammo would out shoot the non-crimped variety – I thought of doing a test of my own.

The test would involve three different rifles, in three different calibers.

RIFLES:

1. 223 REMINGTON: REMINGTON 40X, LEUPOLD 6.5-20X IN JEWEL LIVE CENTER RINGS ON KELBLY BASES.

  1. 243 WINCHESTER: REMINGTON 700 PSS, LEUPOLD 6.5-20X IN LEUPOLD MOUNTS.
  2. 308 WINCHESTER: SAKO TRG-21, BAUSCH & LOMB ELITE 4000 6-24 IN SAKO MOUNTS.

LOADS USED:

  1. 223 REMINGTON: 26-H4895, NOSLER 55 BALLISTIC TIP, FEDERAL 205M IN WINCHESTER CASES
  2. 243 WINCHESTER: 46.5 H414, BERGER 71 HPBT, FEDERAL 210M IN WINCHESTER CASES
  3. 308 WINCHESTER: 42.2 VVN 140, SIERRA 168 MK, FEDERAL 210M IN RWS CASES.

All cases were match prepped and sorted to within 0.5 of a grain, all bullets were molly coated.

I loaded 50 identical rounds for each rifle, 25 of which were crimped and 25 were left without crimps. I tried to put a reasonably heavy crimp on, although none of the bullets had a crimp groove. I fired all of the them as 5 shot groups, over an OEHLER Model 43 PBL.

223 REMINGTON

UNCRIMPED

         

1

2

3

4

5

AVERAGE

0.523

0.596

0.719

0.723

0.528

0.618

           

CRIMPED

         

1

2

3

4

5

AVERAGE

0.458

0.508

0.671

0.371

0.471

0.496

           

VELOCITY

         
           

UNCRIMPED

HIGH

LOW

AVERAGE

ES

SD

 

3198

3159

3178

39

14

           

CRIMPED

HIGH

LOW

AVERAGE

ES

SD

 

3198

3154

3176

44

14

           

243 WIN

         
           

UNCRIMPED

         

1

2

3

4

5

AVERAGE

0.878

1.310

0.641

1.541

0.982

1.070

           

CRIMPED

         

1

2

3

4

5

AVERAGE

0.545

0.488

1.401

1.391

1.092

0.983

           

VELOCITY

         
           

UNCRIMPED

HIGH

LOW

AVERAGE

ES

SD

 

3353

3307

3332

45

20

           

CRIMPED

HIGH

LOW

AVERAGE

ES

SD

 

3327

3293

3312

33

13

           

308 WIN

         
           

UNCRIMPED

         

1

2

3

4

5

AVERAGE

0.259

0.267

0.664

0.355

0.339

0.377

           

CRIMPED

         

1

2

3

4

5

AVERAGE

0.448

0.209

0.375

0.572

0.264

0.374

           

VELOCITY

         
           

UNCRIMPED

HIGH

LOW

AVERAGE

ES

SD

 

2489

2453

2470

36

14

           

CRIMPED

HIGH

LOW

AVERAGE

ES

SD

 

2509

2474

2490

35

12

           

 

Well, when I went into this project, I must admit that I was a bit skeptical about finding any improvements. Now if we look at the groups, we find that the crimped ammo shot approximately 10% better. Also, the standard deviation seems to be lower with the crimped ammo. I think this needs looking into further.

{ Home Page | }

Last updated 31 December 1998